xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CIRCUMCISION OF MALE INFANTS RESEARCH PAPER,
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Brisbane.
December 1993.

[Previous Section]
[Back to Contents]
[Next Section]


10.   POSSIBLE REFORMS

      It may be reasonable to require, either by law or by a
      professional Code of Practice, medical practitioners to inform
      parents of all arguments for and against circumcision before,
      and possibly at least a number of days before, undertaking the
      procedure.  A statutory consent form containing information on
      arguments for and against circumcision could be drafted.  The
      form should be regularly updated with new information.

      It might be reasonable to require that all circumcisions be
      performed by medical practitioners or other experienced and
      skilled people in circumstances which reduce to a minimum any
      adverse consequences.136

   Notes:

    136  For example, access to appropriate resuscitation equipment;
         knowledge of dangers to local anaesthetics, etc.

[Previous Section]
[Back to Contents]
[Next Section]


Cite as:

Circumcision of Male Infants Research Paper. Queensland Law
Reform Commission. Brisbane 1993.


(File prepared 11 June 1998, Revised 15 January 1999)

The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.

  © CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Please visit our sponsor and host: IntactiWiki.