Male Circumcision After the Human Rights Act 1998 [Abstract]

Journal of Civil Liberties (U.K.), Volume 5, Issue 3: Pages 320-337, November 2000.

Peter W. Edge

Abstract

The circumcision of infants, once regarded as relatively uncontroversial, has become a focus for medical and legal debate involving both significant support and pressure groups, and a rapidly growing body of medical and legal literature. This paper considers the legality of infant circumcision in English law, both in the context of established doctrines of family and criminal law, and under the External link Human Rights Act. A number of assumptions underpin this paper, which need to be outlined before moving on to discussion of the substantive English law.

* The External link Journal of Civil Liberties is published at Newcastle-upon-Tyne by External link Legal Services Unit of the External link University of Northumbria.


Cite as:

The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.

Top  © CIRP.org 1996-2024 | Filetree | Please visit our sponsor and host: External link IntactiWiki.