Urology, Volume 64, Issue 6: Page 1167-1168, December 2004.
TO THE EDITOR:
Senkul et al1 reported no adverse effect of male circumcision upon male sexual response. Our survey of the empirical literature reached a different conclusion.2 We documented substantial adverse sexual effects of male circumcision, including significantly reduced penile sensitivity and significantly increased ejaculatory problems.3 As compared with genitally intact men, circumcised men reported significantly elevated levels of negative feelings and emotions related to being circumcised.3 Circumcised men also expressed significantly greater dissatisfaction with their sex lives than did genitally intact men.3
In addition, since heterosexual intercourse requires a female partner, Senkul et al.1 have only considered one-half of the equation. There are significant adverse effects of male circumcision upon female sexual satisfaction.4 Surveys have found that women tend to experience vaginal dryness similar to female arousal disorder significantly more often when the male partner is circumcised.3-5 Women with a genitally intact male partner were significantly more likely to experience orgasm than women whose partner was circumcised.5
Clearly, Senkul’s findings in Turkey should not be extrapolated to Western nations where there is documented empirical evidence of sexual and psychological harm resulting from male circumcision.
The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages are a not-for-profit educational resource and library. IntactiWiki hosts this website but is not responsible for the content of this site. CIRP makes documents available without charge, for informational purposes only. The contents of this site are not intended to replace the professional medical or legal advice of a licensed practitioner.
© CIRP.org 1996-2023 | Please visit our sponsor and host: IntactiWiki.